![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:41 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Okay so the yellow one is A Pantera, but what is that thing on the left?
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:44 |
|
Sorta looks like some sort of 240 with a wild body kit. I love it.
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:46 |
|
AMC AMX/3
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:46 |
|
Detomaso Mangusta?
EDIT: Not even close
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:48 |
|
I didn’t know Detomaso made another car
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:48 |
|
^This
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:48 |
|
The tail light sure look like 240Z
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:50 |
|
The tail lights don’t look right for a Mangusta.
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:51 |
|
Looks like you’re right
![]() 10/11/2016 at 19:52 |
|
Yep, a true oddball. An AMC concept manufactured by Bizzarrini in Italy.
![]() 10/11/2016 at 20:02 |
|
Yeah, I’m wrong
![]() 10/11/2016 at 20:05 |
|
At least you had a guess. I’m stumped. Maybe it was a concept car?
![]() 10/11/2016 at 20:09 |
|
Bman76 got it, AMC AMX/3 concept; you got closer than I did, lol.
![]() 10/11/2016 at 20:14 |
|
That rear end is pretty much perfect .too bad AMC was broke or maybe they would have made it
![]() 10/11/2016 at 21:34 |
|
I’ve read that fear of competition with the Pantera is why AMC did not build the AMX/3.
![]() 10/11/2016 at 22:22 |
|
Too bad I think they could have won.
![]() 10/12/2016 at 08:17 |
|
Strange. The Pantera was shit. From Wikipedia:
rust-proofing was minimal and the quality of fit and finish on these early models was poor with large amounts of
body solder
being used to cover body panel flaws
When your competition is a badly made car, it should be seen as a good thing not a bad thing.